@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Sender: Bob Djurdjevic <•••@••.•••> Subject: Re: cj#775> Margolis' spin on Iraq FROM JACKSONVILLE, FL Richard, I read that Margolis piece a few days ago. It was one of the (few) times he and I saw eye-to-eye on something. Enclosed below is another piece which carries the same theme, but is much more hard-hitting. Similar thoughts crossed my mind when I read George Melloan's OpEd piece in today's WSJ about the reasons for bombing Iraq. He never once mentioned Israel, of course. Bob Dj. A pop quiz on the Middle East -- answers may surprise you Published in The Orlando Sentinel, February 8, 1998: Just so you can keep up with the perpetual crisis in the Middle East, I have a little quiz for you. Question: Which country in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? Answer: Israel. Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non- proliferation treaty and bars international inspections? A: Israel. Q: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions? A: Israel. Q: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire? A: Israel. Q: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)? A: Israel. Q: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed? A: Israel. Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war? A: Israel. Q: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses? A: Israel. Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated? A: Israel. Q: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated? A: Israel. Q: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister? A: Israel. Q: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship in international waters, killing 33 and wounding 177 American sailors? A: Israel. Q: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union? A: Israel. Q: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon? A: Israel. Q: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recentFortune magazine survey of Washington insiders? A: Israel. Q: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes? A: Israel. Q: What country is the United States threatening to bomb because ``U.N.Security Council resolutions must be obeyed?'' A: Iraq. [Posted 02/07/98 3:20 PM EST] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ forwarded by: "Carolyn Ballard" <•••@••.•••> Subject: Fw: South News: US threat of nukes on Iraq Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 21:48:35 -0500 > From: Ed Haynes <•••@••.•••> > To: Multiple recipients of list mlas-vets <•••@••.•••> > Subject: South News: US threat of nukes on Iraq > Date: Monday, February 02, 1998 7:14 PM __ __________ _ _______ ______ / |/ / __/ _ | / |/ / __/ | /| / / __/ / /|_/ / / __ |/ / _/ | |/ |/ / /_/ /_/___/_/ |_/_/|_/___/ |__/|__/___/ Support MSANEWS, a project of learning and enlightenment "A Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste" [ see footer for contact and other pertinent information ] > >___________________________________________________________________________ _ Source: South News Email: <•••@••.•••> To: MSANEWS <•••@••.•••>, Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 13:24:56 +1100 Title: US threat of nukes on Iraq TEXT: Dear colleagues, Newspaper stands in Melbourne today are featuring a front page story in the Age Nukes aimed at Iraq The paper full headline is entitled "Atomic warheads aimed at Iraq after policy switch" The article cites president Clinton's top secret Presidential Directive 60 of November 1997 and talks about the B61 series of mininukes. Full text attached: While the United States preaches for the elimination of chemical and biological weapons it is hypocritically increasing the deployment of new nuclear weapons technology. Six radar-evading B-2 stealth bombers were officially put into the U.S. nuclear force on April 1 1996 at an estimated cost of $US 12 billion. The 3 metre long B61-11 drills deep into the earth before exploding in a small blast whose shockwaves can crush targets hundreds of feet below. The threat of using mini nukes and new convential DU bombs must be resisted. During 1991 gulf war the used small calibre penetrator depeleted uranium weapons which have caused serious radiation sickness problems both in Iraq and Kuwait. It is still hiding the facts from even it own Gulfwar veterans about the Depleted Uranium contamination of its own personnel. DU radiation sickness will not go away. Dave Atomic warheads aimed at Iraq after US policy switch Melbourne Age Page 1 , Monday Feb 2 1998 Washington, Sunday The United States can direct tactical atomic warheads at Iraq for the first time after changing its nuclear weapons policy, according to White House and Pentagon officials. The top-secret directive, signed by the President, Mr Bill Clinton, in November, is part of the administration's contingency plan to consider using atomic bombs on Iraqi weapon sites if President Saddam Hussein launches a biological attack on Israel or other neighboring countries using Scud rockets, say the officials. They said the policy shift involving tactical nuclear weapons and so-called "rogue states", such as Iraq, was made as part of the most extensive overhaul of US policy regarding strategic and tactical nuclear weapons since the Reagan years. "It is US policy to target nuclear weapons if there is the use of weapons of mass destruction" by Iraq, said a senior Clinton adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Whether we would use it is another matter." The new policy was part of Presidential Policy Directive 60, which Mr Clinton approved after consultation with the Defence Secretary, Mr William Cohen, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Hugh Shelton. The United States is the only country to have used atomic weapons in war, dropping bombs on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Through the Reagan administration, US policy promised massive retaliation to prevent nuclear confrontations with the Soviet Union and China. With the end of the Cold War, the threats changed from long-range strategic nuclear weapons targeted against major nations to more flexible weapons of mass destruction that could be used by smaller rogue states such as Iraq. Administration officials say they fear Mr Hussein might use a handful of Scud rockets to spread a powdered version of anthrax spores over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Israel, killing thousands and making parts of Riyadh, Kuwait City and Tel Aviv uninhabitable for decades. During the Gulf War in 1991, President Bush threatened to retaliate with nuclear force if Mr Hussein used biological weapons, but his administration never formally adopted a policy. But it was Mr Bush's warning that has evolved into Mr Clinton's directive. Until November, first use of nuclear weapons on Iraq would have violated US pledges never to make such an attack on a signer of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which includes Iraq. But US officials say Mr Hussein's efforts to develop nuclear weapons would forfeit Iraq's treaty protection. Mr Clinton's threat has been deliberately vague. Pentagon spokesman Mr Ken Bacon said last week the US refused to "rule in or rule out" the use of tactical nuclear warheads. Mr Bacon's words have caused rumblings abroad and among the arms control community. The B61 series of tactical warheads involved in the contingency planning are so-called "mini-nukes" with an explosive force less than one kilotonne. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima had an estimated 13 kilotonnes of explosive power. Even so, the mini-nukes are 300 to 500 times more powerful than the largest conventional, non-nuclear warhead in the US arsenal -AP -=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=- __ __________ _ _______ ______ / |/ / __/ _ | / |/ / __/ | /| / / __/ / /|_/ / / __ |/ / _/ | |/ |/ / /_/ /_/___/_/ |_/_/|_/___/ |__/|__/___/ Views expressed on MSANEWS do not necessarily represent those of the MSANEWS editors, the Ohio State University or any of our associated staff and "watchers". Further distribution of material featured on this list may be restricted. In all cases, please obtain the necessary permission of the authors or rightful owners before forwarding any material to or from this list. This service is meant for the exchange of analyses and news, for both academic and activist usage. We depend on your input. However, this is not adiscussion list. Thank you. To subscribe, send e-mail to: <•••@••.•••> with the message body "subscribe MSANEWS Firstname Lastname". To unsubscribe, send e-mail to the above address, with the message body "unsubscribe MSANEWS". MSANEWS Home Page: <http://msanews.mynet.net/> Comments to the Editors: <•••@••.•••> Submissions for MSANEWS: <•••@••.•••> Problems with subscription: <•••@••.•••> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Forwarded by: Carolyn Ballard <•••@••.•••> Subject: Fwd (the right way)--William Blum on Iraq Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:04:51 -0500 - _______ ____ ______ / |/ / /___/ / /_ // M I D - E A S T R E A L I T I E S / /|_/ / /_/_ / /\ Making Sense of the Middle East /_/ /_/ /___/ /_/ \ www.MiddleEast.Org M E R E X C L U S I V E : AUTHOR CONDEMNS U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAQ __________________________________________________________________ TO RECEIVE MER REGULARLY EMAIL TO: •••@••.••• ------------------------------------------------------------------- M I D - E A S T R E A L I T I E S News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups, and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know from Independent Middle East Experts Around the World. ____________________________________________________________________ MER EXCLUSIVE: T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S V S . I R A Q A S T U D Y I N H Y P O C R I S Y By William Blum* Author of - Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II "Far and away the best book on the topic" - Noam Chomsky "I enjoyed it immensely" - Gore Vidal "We have heard that a half million children have died," said "60 Minutes" reporter Lesley Stahl, speaking of US sanctions against Iraq. "I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And -- and you know, is the price worth it?" Her guest, in May 1996, U.N. Ambassador Madeleine Albright, responded: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price -- we think the price is worth it." Today, Secretary of State Albright travels around the world to gather support for yet more bombing of Iraq. The price, apparently, is still worth it. The price is of course being paid solely by the Iraqi people -- a million or so men, women and children, dead from the previous bombings and seven years of sanctions. The plight of the living in Iraq, plagued by malnutrition and a severe shortage of medicines, is as well terrible to behold. Their crime? They have a leader who refuses to cede all sovereignty to the United States (acting under its usual United Nations cover) which demands that every structure in Iraq, including the presidential palaces, be available for inspection for "weapons of mass destruction". After more than six years of these inspections, and significant destruction of stocks of forbidden chemical, biological, and nuclear weapon material, as well as weapons research and development programs, the UN team still refuses to certify that Iraq is clean enough. Inasmuch as the country is larger than California, it's understandable that the inspectors can not be certain that all prohibited weapons have been uncovered. It's equally understandable that Iraq claims that the United States can, and will, continue to find some excuse not to give Iraq the certification needed to end the sanctions. It can be said that the United States has inflicted more vindictive punishment and ostracism upon Iraq than upon Germany or Japan after World War 2. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * "In the not too distant future, when Iran begins to flex its muscles a bit more, in ways not to Washington's pleasure, it may then be their turn for some good ol' American "diplomacy"." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Saddam Hussein regime must wonder at the high (double) standard set by Washington. Less than a year ago, the U.S. Senate passed an act to implement the "Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction" (Short title: Chemical Weapons Convention), an international treaty which has been ratified by more than 100 nations in its five-year life. The Senate act, Section 307, stipulates that "the President may deny a request to inspect any facility in the United States in cases where the President determines that the inspection may pose a threat to the national security interests of the United States." Saddam has asked for no more than this for Iraq. Presumably, under the Senate act, the White House, Pentagon, etc. would be off limits, as Saddam insists his presidential palaces should be, as well as the military unit responsible for Saddam's personal security, which an American colonel demanded to visit. Section 303 further states that "Any objection by the President to an individual serving as an inspector ... shall not be reviewable in any court." Again, this echoes a repeated complaint from the Iraqis -- a recent team of 16 inspectors included 14 from the US and Britain, Saddam's two principal adversaries, who are -- even as you read this -- busily planning new bombing raids on Iraq. The team was led by a U.S. Marine Corps captain, a veteran of the Gulf War, who has been accused of spying by Iraq. But the Iraqis do not have a corresponding right of exclusion. The same section of the Senate act provides, moreover, that an FBI agent "accompanies each inspection team visit". The wishes of the Iraqi government to place certain sites off limits and to have less partisan inspectors have been dismissed out of hand by U.S. government spokespersons and the American media. "What do they have to hide?" has been the prevailing attitude. The hypocrisy runs deeper yet. In his recent State of the Union address, President Clinton, in the context of Iraq, spoke of how we must "confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them." He castigated Saddam Hussein for "developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons" and called for strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention. Who among his listeners knew, who among the media reported, that the United States had been the supplier to Iraq of much of the source biological materials Saddam's scientists would require to create a biological warfare program? According to a Senate Report of 1994: From 1985, if not earlier, through 1989, a veritable witch's brew of biological materials were exported to Iraq by private American suppliers pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Amongst these materials, which often produce slow and agonizing deaths, were: Bacillus Anthracis, cause of anthrax. Clostridium Botulinum, a source of botulinum toxin. Histoplasma Capsulatam, cause of a disease attacking lungs, brain, spinal cord and heart. Brucella Melitensis, a bacteria that can damage major organs. Clotsridium Perfringens, a highly toxic bacteria causing systemic illness. Clostridium tetani, highly toxigenic. Also, Escherichia Coli (E.Coli); genetic materials; human and bacterial DNA. Dozens of other pathogenic biological agents were shipped to Iraq during the 1980s. The Senate Report pointed out: "These biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction." The United Nations inspectors have uncovered evidence that Iraq was conducting research on pathogen enhancement and biological warfare-related stimulant research on many of the identical types of biological agents shipped to the country from the United States. These shipments continued to at least November 28, 1989 despite the fact that Iraq had been reported to be engaging in chemical warfare and possibly biological warfare against Iranians, Kurds, and Shiites since the early 80s. During the Iraq-Iran war of 1980-88, the United States gave military aid and intelligence information to both sides, hoping that each would inflict severe damage on the other, in line perhaps with what Noam Chomsky has postulated: It's been a leading, driving doctrine of U.S. foreign policy since the 1940s that the vast and unparalleled energy resources of the Gulf region will be effectively dominated by the United States and its clients, and, crucially, that no independent, indigenous force will be permitted to have a substantial influence on the administration of oil production and price. Indeed, there is evidence that Washington encouraged Iraq to attack Iran and ignite the war in the first place. This policy, as well as financial considerations, were likely the motivating forces behind providing Iraq with the biological materials. (Iran was at that time regarded as the greater threat to the seemingly always threatened U.S. national security.) As the American public and media are being prepared to accept and cheerlead the next bombing of the people of Iraq, the stated rationale, the official party line, is that Iraq is an "outlaw" state (or "rogue" state, or "pariah" state -- the media obediently repeats all the White House and State Department buzz words), which is ignoring a United Nations Security Council resolution. Israel, however, has ignored many such resolutions without the U.S. bombing Tel Aviv, imposing sanctions, or even cutting back military aid. But by some arcane ideological alchemy, Israel is not deemed an "outlaw" state by Washington. Neither does the United States regard itself so for turning its back on a ruling of the U.N.'s World Court in 1984 to cease its hostile military actions against Nicaragua, nor for the numerous times the U.S. has totally ignored overwhelming General Assembly resolutions, or for its repeated use of chemical and biological agents against Cuba since the 1960s. The bombing looks to be inevitable. The boys are busy moving all their toys into position; they can already see the battle decorations hanging from their chests. Of course, no one knows what it will accomplish besides more death and destruction. Saddam will remain in power. He'll be more stubborn than ever about the inspections. There may be one consolation for the Iraqi people. The Washington Post has reported that Secretary of Defense William Cohen has indicated that "U.S. officials remain wary of doing so much military damage to Iraq as to weaken its regional role as a counterweight to Iran." In the not too distant future, when Iran begins to flex its muscles a bit more, in ways not to Washington's pleasure, it may then be their turn for some good ol' American "diplomacy". * William Blum is the author of: Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II. See: http://members.aol.com/bblum6/American_holocaust.htm -=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=- MID-EAST REALITIES is published a number of times weekly and the MERTV Program shows weekly on Cable TV. Email to •••@••.••• to receive MER regularly. For past MER articles go to: http://WWW.MiddleEast.Org. M I D - E A S T R E A L I T I E S (c) Copyright 1998 MER may be freely distributed by email and on the Internet so long as there is no editing of any kind. For any print publication, permission in writing is required. •••@••.••• / Fax: 202 362-6965 / Phone: 202 362-5266 @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~ Posted by Richard K. Moore - •••@••.••• - PO Box 26, Wexford, Ireland www.iol.ie/~rkmoore/cyberjournal (USA Citizen) * Non-commercial republication encouraged - Please include this sig * ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
Share: