Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Joe Ferguson wrote: >So, I suggest you also seek out "conservative" venues for your articles, >assuming there are some of these that are essentially honest and valid >(I'm sure this is true just like there are such publications on "the >other side.") Dear cj, Just about the time of Joe's message above, I got a messge from Bob Djurdjevic, of Phoenix, Arizona, who publishes an on-line journal called TRUTH IN MEDIA. He's beyond sterotyping - a mixture of "patriot" and "conservative", with a somewhat unique view of the Balkans due to his Serbian heritage, and a comfortable person to do business with on the net. He saw the "Globalism vs. China" piece and asked to republish it in his journal, which has now been accomplished. What surprised me is that he took the piece in toto - there weren't any parts he had trouble with, although he thought I sounded too pessimistic about the future. Yet, as you might imagine from the sample below, his usual themes include much that many of us would find debatable. I find this very encouraging. The overall transaction constitutes the first "bridge" I've personally been involved with between what one might loosely call the "liberal" and "conservative" camps. I hope to get further contacts from Bob's readers and to offer additional articles (after reviewing them for gratuitous remarks) to Bob. Eventually, it might be possible to begin to constructively discuss some of the differences I have with some of "their" ideas, and see if any kind of cross-chasm consensus can be developed. Joe had the right idea. We must overcome divide-and-conquer tactics of the elite and quite squabbling among ourselves over secondary issues. In solidarity, rkm ________________________________________________________________ Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 Subject: Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/6-7 (25-Jun-97) FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONA ------------------------------------------------------------------- Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/6-7 25-Jun-97 ------------------------------------------------------------------- New York Times' Rosenthal Attacks American Patriots, We Respond * * * Some U.N. Soldiers Roasted, Raped and Killed Somali Civilians * * * Serbia's Coalition "Zajedno" ("Together") No Longer "Zajedno" * * * Plavsic, Bosnian Serb President, Wants Karadzic Investigated * * * NEW YORK TIMES' ROSENTHAL ATTACKS AMERICAN PATRIOTS, WE RESPOND PHOENIX - Two New York Times' syndicated columnist, A.M. Rosenthal, called for new legislation and more aggressive law enforcement against the American "patriots," the word he spelled in apostrophes throughout his column. Here is our response to it, in the form of a letter to the editor which we sent both to the New York Times and to the Arizona Republic of Phoenix, which also carried Rosenthal's column: June 25, 1997; 09:39 AM (PDT) Shelly Belzer Letters Editor THE NEW YORK TIMES New York, NY Subject: A letter to the editor re. A.M. Rosenthal's column Dear Mr. Belzer: Your columnist, A.M. Rosenthal, is all wet, red and blue in his column, "Recipe for Terrorism" (NYT, 6/24/97). Wet - because he evidently doesn't know much about the subject he writes. Red - because his legal ignorance, coupled with his political zeal, would make him a good paralegal in the Clinton/Reno left-wing liberal administration (with the emphasis on "para," meaning "almost, but not quite"). Blue - because throughout his piece, Rosenthal spells the word "patriots" in apostrophes, implying that only the "blue blood" Eastern establishment types can properly define who is a patriot and who isn't. ~--<snip>--~ --- end forward ---
Share: