============================================================================
From: •••@••.•••
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 04:47:56 EST
Subject: Who Stole Roosevelt's America?
To: •••@••.•••
MIME-Version: 1.0
WHO STOLE ROOSEVELT'S AMERICA?
By Carla Binion
January 3, 2000 | Former speaker of the House Jim Wright said recently,
"We seem today on the verge of becoming a corporate state." (Fort Worth
Star Telegram, December 26.) Wright asks what happened to Franklin D.
Roosevelt's idea that this nation does not care about "wealth for wealth's
sake." The former speaker quoted Roosevelt: "Wealth is the means and
people are the ends."
Wright points out that in 1993, proponents of free trade promised a "fair
labor component" to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA.)
However, says Wright, the promoters of free trade have broken that and
other promises. According to Wright:
(1) A NAFTA agency based in Dallas was set up to monitor labor agreements
to improve wages and working conditions. Wright says the agency was all
talk from the outset, that it never worked, and was finally
"unceremoniously closed."
(2) Mexican workers are worse off now than before NAFTA. Wages in 2,000
maquiladora plants have fallen. U. S. corporations now pay about
one-fifth the U. S. minimum wage. The Mexican workers usually live
without electricity or sanitary sewer systems.
(3) A recent $81 billion Exxon-Mobil merger eliminated 16,000 jobs "to
swell its stock profits of about $3.8 billion...a microcosm of what's
happening worldwide."
(4) The common theme among global corporate investors today is:
downsizing, layoffs, mergers. Governments are "privatizing," or selling
national public assets to private multinational corporations. More and
more U. S. plants are closing, so corporations can use the products of
cheap labor outside the country.
Corporations and the politicians who speak for them, claim free trade, or
globalization, uplifts workers in all nations and helps create "unity"
between the American people and citizens of other countries. The reality
is, free trade has only benefited multinational corporations and the
politicians who feed at their troughs.
As Jim Wright points out, downsizing and outsourcing are obvious attempts
by multinational corporations to escape obligations to their U. S.
employees and increase their own profits. Corporate leaders and their
mouthpieces sometimes twist the facts. For example, on December 26, the
CBS program Sunday Morning with Charles Osgood ran a segment which
portrayed dissenting American workers as people who are simply unwilling
to "share" jobs with workers of other nations.
Former Speaker Jim Wright and consumer advocate Ralph Nader are not
"selfish" people unwilling to "share" U. S. jobs. However, as Nader and
other critics of free trade have pointed out, multinational corporations
are unwilling to share the decision-making process with citizen
organizations.
In "The Case Against Free Trade," Nader says: "Corporate lobbyists,
cruising in halls outside the negotiating rooms, have been able to exert
tremendous influence over the [NAFTA and GATT] negotiations. Citizen
groups have not been able to play a parallel role."
Ralph Nader calls globalization a "race to the bottom." The global game
allows corporations to pit country against country to compete for the
lowest wages, lowest environmental standards, and lowest consumer safety
standards. Nader says EPA test results show that U. S. companies in Mexico
dump an industrial solvent, xylene, at around 50,000 times the level
allowed in the U. S., and they dump methylene chloride at around 215,000
times U. S. standards.
Nader also mentions a National Safe Workplace Institute report showing
Mexican workers suffer much higher levels of injuries than American
workers, and that babies born to Mexican workers have an alarming rate of
birth defects. So much for "sharing" the good life with workers of other
countries.
Corporations work to remove environmental and health standards they
dislike. As Nader says, the companies develop an argument about how a
given environmental or health standard violates the rules of a trade
agreement and then insist the health standard be revoked. For example, in
1991, Puerto Rico upgraded its milk supply quality with the Pasteurized
Milk Ordinance, a tough system of regulation. High temperature milk from
Canada was unable to meet the standards, so Puerto Rico banned the
Canadian milk. Canada then challenged Puerto Rico's consumer safety
standards. A panel of five trade bureaucrats (none from Puerto Rico)
heard the case. Puerto Rico had to either allow the Canadian milk in or
face sanctions.
Health and safety standards for products made or consumed in this country
are now subject to review by trade bureaucrats from other nations. NAFTA
and GATT have made the situation worse, effectively lowering U. S.
consumer health and safety standards which might "inhibit free trade."
Journalist Bill Greider says relinquishing our health and safety standards
and other forms of surrendering our national sovereignty are "profoundly
at odds with national history and democratic legacy." ("Who Will Tell The
People," 1992.)
Greider quotes French economist Jacques Attali: "We already know they [the
global economic changes] demand that politicians and statesmen accept the
unpopular abandonment of national sovereignty." He also quotes W. Michael
Blumenthal, chairman of Unisys: "I wouldn't say the nation-state is dead,
but the sovereignty has been greatly circumscribed ... even for a country
as large as the U. S."
Jim Wright says that for most of the 20th century, America wanted to
spread the wealth wider and wider. Wright called it "a people's
capitalism," or the American dream. That dream included such things as
livable wages, secure retirement, and affordable health care for all
Americans.
Today the corporate state moves jobs out of the country, keeps wages low
and unlivable around the globe, and removes secure retirement and
affordable health care. The corporate state does this under the pretense
of raising living standards around the world - allegedly "sharing" the
wealth with other nations. In reality, working standards and wages around
the world are dragged down to the lowest common denominator.
Free trade and globalization will remain a race to the bottom until the
trade debate includes voices such as Jim Wright's and Ralph Nader's. The
debate needs to include Nader's idea that in a workable global economy,
all boats would rise. Wages, health standards, and working conditions
would improve worldwide -- not merely in politicians' rhetoric, but in
reality.
The free trade debate also needs to include Wright's idea that the free
trade wheelers and dealers should factor in Roosevelt's humanity and the
American dream. If moneyed individuals have changed this nation from
FDR's America into a virtual corporate state as Wright suggests, it is
time our politicians stop pretending otherwise. What the American people
need is more straight talk and less corporate spin from political leaders.
Political leaders should spend less time defending free trade and more
time evaluating the fruits of globalization. They should ask, along with
the rest of us, "Who stole Roosevelt's America?" We need to take a good
look at where our nation was before we became a near corporate state and
where we are now. We should examine how we arrived at this point.
At one time, most of us agreed that what made America a prosperous nation
was the fact that we had a large, strong middle class - not the fact that
we spawned a handful of corporate billionaires. Today the gap between the
very rich and the middle class is increasing, around 40 million Americans
live in poverty, and almost 45 million Americans have no health insurance.
Do we want heads of multinational corporations, not elected by the public,
to lead us into the 21st century? Do we want to continue to vote for
politicians who only serve as figureheads - politicians who turn political
power over to those corporations? If we do not like where we are, it is
time we rethink our current system and work toward methods of reform.
Copyright (c) 2000 Carla Binion. All rights reserved.
Republished from <A HREF="http://www.onlinejournal.com/">Online Journal</A>.
========================================================================
•••@••.••• - a political discussion forum
crafted in Ireland by rkm - (Richard K. Moore)
To subscribe, send any message to •••@••.•••
•••@••.••• - an activists forum
To subscribe, send any message to:
•••@••.•••
A public service of "Citizens for a Democratic Renaissance"
•••@••.••• http://cyberjournal.org
**--> Non-commercial reposting is encouraged,
but please include the sig up through this paragraph
and retain any internal credits and copyright notices.
Copyrighted materials are posted under "fair-use".
To see the index of the list archives, send a blank message to:
•••@••.••• or to:
•••@••.•••
Recent postings are more convenientlhy available at:
http://members.xoom.com/centrexnews/
To sample the book-in-progress, "Globalization and the
Revolutionary Imperative", see:
http://cyberjournal.org/cdr/gri/gri.html
Help create the Movement for a Democratic Renaissance!
A community will evolve only when
the people control their means of communication.
-- Frantz Fanon
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful
committed citizens can change the world,
indeed it's the only thing that ever has.
- Margaret Mead
Share: