cj#710> Assassination claim (fwd)


Richard Moore

Dear cj,

I have no knowledge as to the accuracy of the following report.  If it is
true, then I presume that would imply some level of cooperation from French
officials.  If anyone has anything that would substantiate or discredit any
part of this report, please send it in.


Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997
Sender: Francisco Lopez <•••@••.•••>
Subject: CN: Diana was assassinated (and three months pregnant?)

From: RevCOAL <•••@••.•••>

              Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 10  Num. 98
                     ("Quid coniuratio est?")


U.K., French, Journalists Confide:

This is Sherman Skolnick.

In the last few days I have interviewed, extensively, well-informed United
Kingdom (UK), French, and other journalists. (And I promised never to use
their names because of the nature of what was discussed.) They told me
that many of the distinguished journalists in the United Kingdom are
aware, from their own reliable sources in key places in the government and
elsewhere, that British Intelligence had assassinated Princess Diana.

They went over details, of the specifics of how they, as journalists, from
their sources (separate from me), know about the technical information on
how the assassination was carried out.

But first of all, we have to discuss why the real story is not being told,
in print, or on the radio, or on television, in the UK.

Not many know that in the UK they have the Official Secrets Act. By that
Act, the London government has the power, throughout the UK, to order that
certain subjects are absolutely forbidden to be discussed.  Currently, the
forbidden subject is any discussion of possible foul play in the death of
Princess Diana and her intended husband Dodi Fayed.

Further than that, any discussion is forbidden about how the Official
Secrets Act exactly works.  When there is a subject that an editor,
publisher, or station manager believes would be covered by the Official
Secrets Act, they must immediately inform the London government.  And if
the London government issues what they call a "D Notice," then these media
outlets throughout the UK are not only forbidden to go forward with any
story that they're working on; but also, the D Notice serves as a
potential seizure:  it authorizes the UK, through their various
operatives, to immediately seize and close down any printing plant that is
in the process of printing such a story, any radio station, or any radio
or TV transmitter.  They are immediately seized by the London government,
closed down, and the publisher, the editor, and the key personnel
(including the writer of the story) are immediately put under arrest.

And the worst part of it is, the rest of the media is not even allowed to
mention that these people have been arrested and their publishing and
transmitting facilities seized.  In other words, it is forbidden to
discuss the D Notice and also forbidden to discuss the technical operation
of the Official Secrets Act. So, there is censorship regarding the
instruments of censorship.

The journalists I spoke with generally agree with what I found out from
other sources about how Diana was assassinated. Apparently another car, a
supposed "decoy car" which was to protect her, in fact carried agents of
British Intelligence.  It came up behind the Mercedes which Diana and the
others were in and hit it in some way.  And there was already an
arrangement through others that a chemical slick was put on the roadway
within the tunnel.  Ahead of the slick, a heavy construction truck, on
signal, backed into the tunnel and dropped or placed an obstruction of a
very heavy nature in the roadway.  So any which way it turned around, the
Diana car could not have gotten away.

Thereafter, British Intelligence planted disinformation (and continues to
do so) throughout the world.  (For example, "The car came from a junkyard;
it was formerly stolen; it's a defective car," "The driver was drunk,"
"The speedometer was stuck at 120; the car was going over 100 mph.")
There's been a flood of these fake stories promoted worldwide by British
Intelligence, in which the CIA has seen to it that the American press
replicates these stories.

Leading journalists in the UK agree with stories by me and others that
Diana was assassinated.  And the simple reason for the murder is, British
Intelligence is pledged to protect the monarchy.  The monarchy was *not*
going to have a new step-father for the heir to the throne, Prince
William; they weren't going to have a Moslem.

Further than that, it comes out that Diana had already been given an
engagement ring by Dodi Fayed.  What has *not* come out is that she was
3-months pregnant.

So when you put that together, British Intelligence, under their rules,
was "justified"  in wiping these people out for the purposes of the
monarchy, protection of the realm, and "national security."

 +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +

For related stories, visit:

       Views expressed do not necessarily  reflect  those
       of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
        I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
  New mailing list: leave message in the old hollow tree stump.
                       DONATIONS APPRECIATED
       Send to: Brian Redman, 310 S. Prairie St. (#202)
                Champaign, IL  61820
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
  pauperem.                    -- Liber Proverbiorum  XXXI: 8-9


Posted by Richard K. Moore - •••@••.••• - PO Box 26   Wexford, Ireland
         http://www.iol.ie/~rkmoore/cyberjournal            (USA Citizen)
  * Non-commercial republication encouraged - Please include this sig *