cj#765> Cuban democracy: a strategic vision for revolution


Richard Moore

Yesterday, after proclaiming that the revolution had begun (a tough job,
but someone's got to do it) in Canada (Prince Edward Island), I closed
  >There is an urgent need for both tactical aggressiveness and
  >strategic vision.

We need new political and economic organizing principles if we want to
defeat globalization and upgrade from phony democracy to real democracy.
In fact I've proposed some schemes in that direction ("model of revolution
& democracy", 1/17).  Those ideas arose partly from experience and reading,
but they were mainly speculative.  The scheme _seemed_ like it could be
made to work, but I wasn't aware of any precedents that could provided
adequate empirical support.

By either serendipity or the intervention of kharma, following the posting
of the MAI story, the next message I received was a very interesting and
useful description (below) of how the Cuban political system works.  I had
heard good things about the Cuban system, but as I read the details I could
hardly believe how close to ideal their democratic process seems to be.

I'm sure the system must have problems somewhere, and perhaps works well
due to special Cuban circumstances, but by any measure I can think of its
the best model I've seen.  My new working hypothesis is:

        (1) Canada's anti-MAI campaign is the tactical leading edge
            of the budding counter revolution to globalization.

        (2) Cuba's political system provides a strategic vision
            for revolutionary democracy

We have two solid facts: an officially sanctioned counter-sytemic
initiative is afoot in the First World; a nation exists where popular will
is officially implemented in a very effective way.  The MAI effort is
deserving of global support and emulation; it provides a (necessary) focus
for action.  Cuba's system shows that democracy is possible, which cuts
through endless abstract debates on that topic.  And defense of Cuba from
US aggression provides a second focus for revolutionary action.

>>From this perspective, US (ie globalist) emnity to Cuba is understandable,
as is the media's consistent mis-portrayal of the Cuban experience.

Revolution now has a starting point and a finishing vision: we only need to
fill in the middle bits.


Charles McKelvey <•••@••.•••> wrote to wsn:

     I have been to Cuba four times since 1993.  Last summer, I was there
for ten weeks, and my activities included in-depth interviews of
university professors and leaders in the Popular Councils concerning the
political process in Cuba.  In addition, I talked to many different people
that I met informally, sometimes through families with which I was
connected and other times with people I met as I traveled about Havana by
myself.  I do not consider myself an expert on Cuba.  I would describe
myself as someone who is knowledgeable about Third World national
liberation movements and is in the process of learning about the Cuban
case.  My general impression is that the revolutionary government enjoys a
high degree of legitimacy among the people.  Occasionally, I came across
someone who was alienated from the system.  There disaffection was not
rooted in the political system but in the economic hardships that have
emerged during the "special period."  The great majority seemed to support
the system and seemed very well informed about the structures of the world
economy and the challenges that Cuba faces.  Many defended the system with
great enthusiasm and strong conviction.  I had expected none of this prior
to my first trip, recalling my visit to Tanzania in 1982, by which time
many had come to view "ujamaa socialism" as a faded dream, at least
according to my impressions during my brief visit.  But to my surprise, I
found much support for the revolutionary project in Cuba.  I could not
help but contrast this to the United States, where there is widespread
cynicism in regard to political and other institutions.

     The Cuban political system is based on a foundation of local
elections.  Each urban neighborhood and rural village and area is
organized into a "circumscription," consisting generally of 1000 to 1500
voters.  The circumscription meets regularly to discuss neighborhood or
village problems.  Each three years, the circumscription conducts
elections, in which from two to eight candidates compete.  The nominees
are not nominated by the Communist Party or any other organizations.  The
nominations are made by anyone in attendance at the meetings, which
generally have a participation rate of 85% to 95%.  Those nominated are
candidates for office without party affiliation.  They do not conduct
campaigns as such.  A one page biography of all the candidates is
widely-distributed.  The nominees are generally known by the voters, since
the circumscription is generally not larger than 1500 voters.  If no
candidate receives 50% of the votes, a run-off election is held.  Those
elected serve as delegates to the Popular Councils, which are intermediary
structures between the circumscription and the Municipal Assembly.  Those
elected also serve simultaneously as delegates to the Municipal Assembly.
The delegates serve in the Popular Councils and the Municipal Assemblies
on a voluntary basis without pay, above and beyond their regular

     The Municipal Assemblies elect the chief executives of the
Municipality, who have supervision over the various ministries, such as
health and education, within the Municipality.  The Municipal Assemblies
also elect an electoral commission,  which develops a slate of candidates
for the Provincial Assembly for ratification by the voters in the
province.  The Provincial Assemblies have responsibilities in the Province
which parallel those of the Municipal Assembly in the Municipality,
including electing an electoral commission which develops a slate of
candidates for the National Assembly for ratification by the voters in the
nation.  The National Assembly is the legislative branch, and as such it
makes the laws.  It also elects the President of the Council of State, who
appoints a cabinet and makes a government.  The President of the Council
of State is Fidel Castro, a position to which he has been re-elected
since, I believe, 1975, when the Constitution was established.

     The role of the Communist Party in the political process is very
different from what I had previously thought.  The Cuban Communist Party
is not an electoral party.  It does not nominate or support candidates for
office.  Nor does it make laws or select the head of state.  These roles
are played by the national assembly, which is elected by the people, and
for which membership in the Communist Party is not required.  Most members
of the national, provincial, and municipal assemblies are members of the
Communist Party, but many are not, and those delegates and deputies who
are party members are not selected by the party but by the people in the
electoral process.  The party is not open to anyone to join.  About
fifteen percent of adults are party members.  Members are selected by the
party in a thorough process that includes interviews with co-workers and
neighbors.  Those selected are considered model citizens.  They are
selected because they are viewed as strong supporters of the revolution;
as hard and productive workers; as people who are well-liked and respected
by their co-workers and neighbors; as people who have taken leadership
roles in the various mass organizations of women, students, workers, and
farmers; as people who take seriously their responsibilities as spouses
and parents and family members; and as people who have "moral" lives, such
as avoiding excessive use of alcohol or extramarital relations that are
considered scandalous.  The party is viewed as the vanguard of the
revolution.  It makes recommendations concerning the future development of
the revolution, and it criticizes tendencies it considers
counterrevolutionary.  It has enormous influence in Cuba, but its
authority is moral, not legal.  The party does not make laws or elect the
president.  These tasks are carried out by the National Assembly, which is
elected by the people.

     Prior traveling to Cuba, I had heard that the Cuban Communist Party
is the only political party and that in national elections the voters are
simply presented with a slate of candidates, rather than two or more
candidates and/or political parties from which to choose.  These two
observations are correct.  But taken by themselves, they given a very
misleading impression.  They imply that the Cuban Communist Party develops
the slate, which in fact it does not do.  Since the slate makers are named
by those who are elected, the ratification of the slate by the voters is
simply the final step in a process that begins with the voters.  The
reason given for using a slate rather than presenting voters with a choice
at this stage was that the development of the slate ensures that all
sectors (such as women, workers, farmers, students, representative of
important social service agencies in the jurisdiction, etc.) are

     As I indicated, Cubans tend to enthusiastically defend their system.
They point out that the elected members of the assemblies are not
professional politicians who must rely on fund-raising to be elected, as
occurs in the United States.  Moreover, it avoids excessive conflict among
political parties, at the expense of the common good.  As my good friend
Professor Guzman observed, "it is a system which avoids the absurdities
and distortions of bourgeois democracy."  They seem to believe in it.  I
think it makes sense.  I also think that the political system in the
United States is experiencing a legitimation crisis, so I am not inclined
to recommend it to Cubans.  It seems to me that they have developed a
system carefully designed to ensure that wealthy individuals do not have
greater voice than working class individuals, and therefore it is a system
that is more advanced in protecting the political rights of citizens.

     Although I have not had the experience, I suppose it would be
possible to encounter a Cuban who feels alienated and who might say, "The
Communist Party controls everything."  This is true, because a majority of
those elected are members of the Communist Party, and the higher up you
go, the more likely it is to be so.  Nevertheless, the selection of
leadership is based on local elections.  The Communist Party occupies a
position of authority in the political institutions because the people
support it.  Our hypothetical alienated person is really expressing a
frustration over the widespread support of the people for the Communist
Party.  The mechanism for the removal of members of the Communist Party
from positions of authority in the government is in place, should that
desire be the popular sentiment.

        It is ironic that while many in the West assume that Cuba is less
protective of political rights, in fact they are developing a system that
is deliberately designed to ensure that the right of the people to vote
does not become manipulated in a process controlled by the wealthy, and it
therefore is more protective of political rights.  Many in the West make
the same kind of false assumption in regard to the issue of freedom of the
press.  Take the case of newspapers.  Many in the West think that the
state controls the newspapers.  In fact, the state prohibits the private
ownership of newspapers.  The various newspapers are operated by the
various organizations:  the Communist Party, the federations of workers
associations, the federation of farmers associations, the federation of
student associations, etc.  In the United States, the newspapers are owned
by corporations.  In Cuba, those with financial resources to do so are not
allowed to form a newspaper.  This is a restriction on the right of
property ownership, a restriction imposed for the common good, in
particular to ensure that the people have a voice and that the wealthy do
not have a voice disproportionate to their numbers.  By prohibiting
private ownership of newspapers, the system ensures that the various
newspapers will be under the control of the various mass organizations.
So it is a system which pushes the principle of freedom of the press to a
more advanced level than what occurs in capitalism, ensuring that all
exercise this right equally and avoiding a situation where the wealthy
exercise freedom of the press but the workers and farmers possess it only
as an abstract right.

     So the Cuban revolutionary project has many gains, not only in the
area of social and economic rights, but also in the area of political and
civil rights.  Because of these achievements, the system enjoys wide
popular support, in spite of the hardships caused by U.S. opposition and
by the collapse of the Soviet Union.    Drawing upon the institutions that
they have developed over the last forty years, they are responding to the
present challenges and are surviving in a post-Cold War world.  The
strength and vitality of these institutions is worthy of our
investigation, for Cuba may represent an important case as we seek to
understand how peripheral and semi-peripheral states can overcome the
legacy of underdevelopment.

     For those of us on the Left, Cuba's achievements represent the
fullest attainment of our hopes.  The Cuban revolutionary project is
deserving of our active and engaged support.

Charles McKelvey
Professor of Sociology
Presbyterian College
Clinton, South Carolina


Posted by Richard K. Moore - •••@••.••• -  PO Box 26, Wexford, Ireland
         www.iol.ie/~rkmoore/cyberjournal                   (USA Citizen)
  * Non-commercial republication encouraged - Please include this sig *