@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 15:42:28 -0500
Sender: Progressive News & Views List <•••@••.•••>
Subject: The CHIAPAS - End of `end of history'
/* Written by peg:greenleft in igc:greenleft.news */
Title: Chiapas: the end of `the end of history'
Australian MIKE LEACH visited Mexico and Chiapas earlier this year. He
reports on the ongoing struggle.
A crowd of 500 Mexican protesters faces the federal army in the remote
tropical jungle of southern Chiapas. The protesters are chanting for
``Peace, with Justice and Dignity'' and demand entry into the valley of
Aguascalientes.
Military trucks and soldiers block the road which leads to a large wooden
meeting place and library incongruously located deep in the Lacandona
forest, a few kilometres from the Guatemalan border. Mexico City is over
1000 kilometres away, but the confrontation makes the front page of the
national anti-government newspaper.
Fifteen months beforehand, on New Year's Day 1994, the Zapatista National
Liberation Army (EZLN) occupied San Cristobal and other towns in the Mexican
state of Chiapas. The armed uprising of indigenous peasants against a racist
regime also signalled the organisation of agricultural workers against
neo-liberal economic policies.
The rebellion coincided with the implementation of NAFTA (North American
Free Trade Agreement), the latest triumph of US imperialism in Central
America. The agreement abolished Article 27 of the Mexican constitution,
which limited the concentration of land ownership, providing some minimal
protection for Mexican campesinos. NAFTA also threatens to flood Mexico with
cheap US corn imports, which will destroy the majority of communities which
rely on the marginal returns from their crop for survival.
The EZLN occupation of major towns was followed by the expropriation of huge
estates in the region. The EZLN struck a decisive blow against the New Right
ideological fantasy of ``the end of history'', a development which has
deeply worried US investors in the region.
For over a year, campesinos collectively farmed the occupied land in
southern Chiapas. In August last year the EZLN hosted the first National
Democratic Convention, deep in the mountains of Chiapas in the valley of
Aguascalientes.
Approximately 6000 Mexicans from pro-democratic and progressive groups
attended, including opposition party activists, trade unionists and church
leaders. The Zapatistas succeeded in providing a focal point for
pro-democratic forces throughout Mexico, now broadly unified under the title
of Sociedad Civil.
Opposition to the regime of President Zedillo and NAFTA is enormous and
mobilising constantly throughout Mexico. The central square of Mexico City
is in a state of permanent occupation by protesters, many of whom marched
from Chiapas earlier this year. Massive anti-government rallies occur on a
weekly basis, attracting up to 100,000 people in support of the EZLN.
At one march I was impressed by the degree of solidarity among anti-PRI
forces as striking public transport unions combined forces with the
pro-democracy movement in an enormous demonstration which surrounded the
presidential palace. Even the state-run Anthropology Museum bears a large
sign, erected by staff, calling for the overthrow of the government.
The opposition has clearly cast a serious question mark over the ability of
the PRI to deliver stability and profits to US corporations. In January
Chase Manhattan Bank urged the Mexican government to eliminate the
Zapatistas in order to restore investor confidence. This was an unofficial
condition of the huge loans provided recently to prop up the regime. Wall
Street was baying for the blood of the Zapatistas and their supporters.
On February 9, the Mexican army invaded and occupied the regions controlled
by the Zapatistas. The army crushed the Zapatistas' revolutionary enclave
with aerial bombardments, torture, murder of civilians and forcible
evictions. The EZLN retreated to the Lacandona jungle bordering Guatemala,
and Chiapas has been delivered back to the powerful coalition of racist
landlords and security forces which has dominated the continent for 500
years.
I witnessed the results of this invasion in late March as a participant in
one of the regular caravans to Chiapas organised by the Sociedad Civil to
distribute aid and continue the dialogue initiated by the first National
Democratic Convention.
The caravan was rapturously received by huge demonstrations of support for
the Zapatistas' struggle as it headed south toward Chiapas, with
anti-government rallies and marches in Puebla, Veracruz and Comalcalco. Once
in Chiapas, however, the caravan was met by the silence and reserve of a
population under the gun of the army and politically divided. Chiapas is
governed by a brutal alliance between the ruling party, PRI, the landlords
and foreign capital.
Almost immediately our bus convoy was fired upon and robbed at gunpoint by
the private army of the landlords, the Guardia Blanca. Human rights workers
in the region complained of similar routine intimidation by security forces,
mild in comparison to the retaliation of the landlords against campesinos
who squatted the land under the protection of the EZLN. Political murders
and disappearances are reported regularly.
Crossing into the areas held by the Zapatistas only six weeks earlier
confirmed the account of the invasion in EZLN communiques. Vacant villages,
sacked by the army, dotted the roadside. The campesinos fled as the army
invaded, strafing villages from the air and tearing down hectares of forest
to secure the only road south.
In an attempt to divide the communities, some villages had been partially
reoccupied by relocated campesinos from outside Chiapas, brought in by the
government.
The retribution of the security forces has been savage. The army currently
occupies the indigenous villages of southern Chiapas as the Mayan
communities slowly return from their mountain refuges to find their houses
sacked, their food supplies and agricultural equipment stolen and their
livestock shot by soldiers. Most communities in the region are teetering on
the brink of starvation.
Rivers and wells surrounding the erstwhile EZLN headquarters of Guadalupe
Tepayac have been poisoned. Other villages are blockaded to prevent the
planting of crops crucial to the survival of the Mayan population.
Guadalupe Tepayac is entirely vacant save for the army in campesinos' homes.
We saw ransacked and burned houses, half packed bags and food left on tables
- testimony to the panic which must have accompanied the exodus of the
villagers. Residents of San Jose told us that their only source of water, a
hose to an underground well, had been sabotaged by the army as it swept
through in search of the EZLN. They are now unable to plant their maize
crops.
One of the important functions of the caravans is to reconvene the National
Democratic Forum and maintain pressure on the PRI at a national level. The
potent symbol of pro-democratic unity, the meeting place built by the EZLN
in Aguascalientes, has been destroyed and is currently occupied by the army.
The attempt to enter the site was forcibly blocked, resulting in a
spontaneous demonstration outside the military encampment. The later
pictures in the progressive daily La Journada were a powerful image of civil
protest in a police state.
Eventually the dialogue was convened in Guadalupe Tepayac, as soldiers
patrolled the backblocks of the town and watched from foxholes on the
surrounding hillsides. Numerous strategies and proposals for continuing the
broader struggles against the PRI and NAFTA were discussed, though clearly
the prime importance of the dialogue was in the physical presence of
anti-PRI forces in the occupied areas.
The struggle fuelled by the EZLN continues. The recent US loan package has
not rescued the economy, and political instability is likely to continue for
the foreseeable future. Sub-comandante Marcos, in hiding with the EZLN, has
become a folk hero and remains an enormously powerful presence in Mexican
politics through his regular communiques to opposition newspapers. On the
international implications of the Zapatista uprising, Marcos has the final
say:
``People are going to question not only the whole economic and political
project of this country, but the ascendancy of neo-liberalism in all of
Latin America ... I know this because when we rose up against the government
we began to receive displays of solidarity and sympathy not only from
Mexicans, but from indigenous people in Chile, Argentina, Canada, the United
States and Central America. They told us that the uprising represents
something they wanted to say, and now they had found the words to say it,
each in his or her respective country. I believe the fallacious notion of
the end of history has finally been destroyed.''
[Thanks to Pamela Baldauf for some references used in this article. Anyone
wishing to participate in or otherwise support the regular aid caravans to
Chiapas, or the Mexican Civil Society, may contact Flora Guerrero,
International Network Coordinator, Sociedad Civil, corre Apto. 5-21
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. Fax 527 315 1974.]
First posted on the Pegasus conference greenleft.news by
Green Left Weekly. Correspondence and hard copy subsciption
inquiries: •••@••.•••
Six-month airmail subscriptions (22 issues) to Green Left Weekly
are available for A$60 (North America) and A$75 (South America,
Europe & Africa) from PO Box 394, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
Posted by Richard K. Moore <•••@••.•••>
Wexford, Ireland (USA citizen)
Editor: The Cyberjournal (@CPSR.ORG)
See the CyberLib at:
http://www.internet-eireann.ie/cyberlib
See Cyber-Rights library:
http://jasper.ora.com/andyo/cyber-rights/cyber-rights.html
You are encouraged to forward and cross-post messages and online materials
for non-commercial use, provided they are copied in their entirety, with
all headers, signatures, etc., intact.
~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~--~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
Share: