rkm website: http://cyberjournal.org
Below is a draft of the main section, the heart, of the next article. I need to submit the article today, Sunday, so please, if you have suggestions or feedback, send them in right away.
“Of course there is a class war, but it’s my class, the rich class, that is waging the war, and we’re winning.”
– Warren Buffet
As Warren Buffet quips, we are in a class war – and the regime-change project is the cabal’s war plan to win a total and lasting victory over the rest of humanity. It is important that those of us in the 99% under-class realize we’re under systematic attack. And it’s important that we realize that the core principle of modern warfare is full-spectrum dominance: pro-active control over every domain of engagement. We need to be aware of the many ways in which we’re being attacked.
We’ve seen the principle of full-spectrum dominance in Iraq for example, where first the air-defenses are taken out, then the communications infrastructure, then transport, etc, each domain of engagement being dominated in its turn. In such military engagements, domestic public opinion is also a domain of engagement, and dominance there has been pursued via embedded journalism, media propaganda, lies by officials, etc.
In the regime-change project – the class war – there are many domains of engagement over which dominance must be achieved and maintained.
• Russia and China
Russia and China are a very special case. They are cooperating closely in pursuing their national interests in opposition to the cabal’s plans, while at the same time gaining as much advantage as possible from the existing global marketplace. They are seeking a stable multi-polar world order, and have formed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the BRICS alliance. Because of their size, wealth, and military clout,
Russia and China
pose the only serious geopolitical obstacle to the establishment of the cabal’s centralized global regime.
Full-spectrum dominance is being pursued
against Russia and China in several different domains.
One of these is the domain of destabilization, particularly in the case of Russia. Russia took a major hit
, for example,
with the breakup of the Soviet Union – which was facilitated, according to Brzezinski, by the CIA-sponsored war between the Soviets and Afghanistan, which fatally over-stretched the Soviet economy and brought Yeltsin to power, an agent of the West, who did all he could to destroy what was left of the Russian economy. Subsequently we’ve had the CIA-sponsored ‘colored revolutions’, aimed at aligning Russia’s neighbors with the West.
In the military domain the US has been encircling Asia with military bases and anti-missile systems, while meanwhile developing and deploying
space-based and other hi-tech
weapons systems. All of this adds up to a first-strike capacity, enabling the US to initiate a nuclear exchange while inhibiting an effective response.
China, in order to support its growing economy, needs access to oil and other resources. To ensure that access, China has been making investments and long-term trade deals, particularly in Africa. In response the US has set up AFRICOM, with the mission of nullifying those investments and trade deals via regime-change projects, as we’ve seen recently in Libya. Such actions represent direct attacks on Chinese strategic interests.
The AFRICOM initiatives and the encirclement programs are preliminary acts of war, and
Russia and China are well aware of this.
Russia and China will either need to yield sovereignty over their national destiny, or else military force will be used to neutralize them as competing powers.
This is how the building site is being cleared for regime change, one way or the other, in the case of Russia and China.
• The Third World
As John Perkins explains in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, the Third World has long been under attack by an aggressive campaign of debt entrapment. As a condition of receiving IMF refinancing packages, nations must submit to restructuring agreements, which open up the nation’s assets to privatization, and essentially bring the nations under direct cabal management, via the IMF.
In those cases where this approach does not succeed, regime-change projects are being pursued, as we’ve seen in Iraq, Afghanistan, and most recently Libya. Syria, Iran, and North Korea are on the list for future regime-change initiatives, whenever the Pentagon judges the timing to be right.
Various pretexts are being used in order to achieve acceptance of these regime-change projects in the domain of Western public opinion. With Iraq, we had phony claims about weapons of mass destruction; with Libya, we had phony reports that Gaddafi was bombing civilians; with Iran, we have phony reports that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons capability. And always with such regime-change projects, the claim of ‘humanitarian intervention’ is used.
This is how the building site is being cleared
for regime change
, in the case of the Third World.
• Western nations
Western governments were long ago corrupted and seduced into joining the neoliberal globalization bandwagon, which has systematically undermined the vitality of Western economies, and whose ‘free-trade’ laws have taken away regulatory sovereignty. In this way the West’s
manufacturing capacity has been decimated, and Western nations have
become dependent on the global economy for their very survival.
Meanwhile, the cabal has used the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger Group to indoctrinate Western leaders into the cabal agenda. We’ve gotten to the point, as with Sarkosy and Merkel, where candidates are selected at Bilderberger meetings, and then promoted into power by well-funded political campaigns.
All of this set the stage for the
orchestrated economic collapse of September 2008. Instead of doing the sensible thing, which would have been to put the failed banks into receivership ala Iceland, the indoctrinated leaders accepted the absurd doctrine of ‘too big to fail’, and committed themselves to bailing out the banks. While the public was told the collapse was only a liquidity crisis, insiders knew that in fact the whole banking system was insolvent. There was no way the nations could afford those bailouts.
Thus the insolvency of the banks was transformed into the insolvency of Western treasuries. Once this was achieved, the cabal began incrementally bringing Western nations under the direct management of cabal agents, first Ireland, and more recently Greece and Italy. By means of the bailout scam the economic-hitman strategy crossed the Rubicon from the Third World to the West, bringing with it draconian austerity and wholesale privatization.
Germany has been the most resistant to these destabilization programs, retaining a strong economy and a robust manufacturing sector, and enjoying a highly profitable export trade. At the same time, German banks are heavily invested in the failed banks and in the bonds of the bankrupt European nations, and as the global economy continues to collapse,
Germany will be gradually but inevitably being pulled down with the rest of Europe.
The US seems to be standing outside this scenario, with the dollar continuing as a de facto global reserve currency. But in fact the US is totally bankrupt, with astronomical budget and trade deficits. In order to keep operating, the Federal Reserve is simply printing money, and it is getting by with it because of the dollar’s reserve currency status.
The rug can be pulled out from under the US economy any time the cabal so chooses.
In this regard, it is important to understand exactly how the the collapse of 2008 was brought about. The vulnerabilities, in terms of over-extended banks and toxic-derivative holdings, had been present for some time. But the vulnerabilities were hidden because the banks were permitted to pretend on their books that the toxic assets were sound assets. Rockefeller’s Bank of International Settlements in Basel Switzerland then pulled the plug: it announced
the ‘mark-to-market’ rule –
the toxic assets must be put on the books at their actual market value. Thus the whole house of cards came down all at once.
Similarly, there is now another house of cards that can be brought down at any time. There are $600 trillion of paper wealth tied up in derivatives and credit-default swaps. Whenever the cabal chooses, the plug can be pulled. It is only necessary to tighten the rules, and force banks and investors to start settling their derivative accounts. When this happens, there is nowhere that those
can be found, as the world’s total annual GDP is only $65 trillion. The final and total collapse of the Western economy will come all at once, bringing the US down with it.
This is how the building site is being cleared
for regime change
, in the case of the Western nations.
• Western public opinion
Although the cabal is quite willing to use whatever force is necessary to achieve its objectives, up to and including orchestrating major wars, it never relies exclusively on force. A way is always sought to bring Western public opinion into alignment with those objectives. Thus military interventions are portrayed as ‘humanitarian’, bailouts are portrayed as ‘unfortunately necessary’, and austerity is portrayed as a ‘path to growth recovery’. Such false portrayals are sold to the public by propaganda from the cabal-controlled mass media, and by the lies of government officials.
Such measures have succeeded, for the most part, in getting Western populations to grudgingly accept the orchestrated collapse process. However, as the impact of the collapse is beginning to affect more and more people directly, public opinion is becoming increasingly angry and frustrated with the state of affairs. Media propaganda and official lies are failing to neutralize this growing anger. One is tempted to conclude that the cabal is losing its touch, that it is failing in this case to successfully manage public opinion.
Such a conclusion, however, would be mistaken. We need to keep in mind that the agenda of the cabal is quite different this time around. In the past, the cabal, by means of media propaganda and government lies, was always seeking to maintain support for the system they control: capitalism and Western governments. This time around, the agenda of the cabal is to discard capitalism and national governments, and replace them with the new centralized, non-growth system. Public anger and frustration feeds directly into this agenda – provided it is channeled appropriately.
The formula is an old one, known as ‘problem, reaction, solution’. That’s how the Federal Reserve was brought into existence back in 1913. First cabal-agent JP Morgan manufactured the problem (a run on the banks), then the cabal waited for the expected reaction (a public outcry that ‘something be done’), and finally they offered their ‘solution’ (the cabal-owned Federal Reserve). By the time people started realizing that the solution was worse than the problem, it was too late.
With the regime-change project, the manufactured ‘problem’ includes not just the economic crisis itself, but also the fact that banks are responsible for the crisis, and governments are failing to do anything to alleviate the crisis. The desired ‘reaction’ is not just that people cry out for ‘something be done’ about the collapse, but that they also a cry out for something be done about corrupt and incompetent governments, and that something be done about the power of banks and corporations. That is to say, the desired reaction is that people cry out for regime change.
In order to achieve this desired reaction, the cabal is employing sophisticated mind-control techniques – called psy-ops in the trade – involving the Internet and grassroots movements. The first clear example I saw of this was ‘Zeitgeist’, a viral YouTube video that was soon followed by the ‘Zeitgeist Addendum’, and a Zeitgeist Movement. At first I too was taken in by Zeitgeist, because the initial video gives one of the smoothest and most comprehensive descriptions of the evils of our age that I had ever seen. It very professionally presented, and it pulls no punches about false-flag operations, the power of the banks, the corruption of governments, etc. I thought to myself, “Wow, this is a wake-up call that can really make a difference”.
However my illusions were soon shattered, when the Addendum came out. While Zeitgeist is an example of ‘stating the problem’, the Addendum is an example of ‘appropriately channeling’ the resulting reaction. The Addendum paints a picture of a sci-fi technocratic future, with shiny meg-lev trains, futuristic cities that operate like beehives, and where society’s decisions are to be made by engineering technocrats.
The Addendum doesn’t mention the Soviet-style attitude-adjustment centers that would be needed to deal with those who couldn’t stomach such a regimented society. Nor does it say anything about how the technocrats would be selected, or how their priorities would be determined. It’s an unrealistic and frightening vision, but many of those who were captured by the initial Zeitgeist video have been successfully channeled into embracing that vision.
The Zeitgeist Movement is alive and well, with chapters in all 50 US states, and in 48 nations around the world. We see here a perfect example of the ‘problem, reaction, solution’ paradigm in action. Those who have bought into the Movement are eager to abandon the current system, and they can be expected to readily accept the cabal’s new world order, as long as it is sold to them with appropriate propaganda spin.
A more recent Internet psy-op is the ‘Anonymous Movement’. This is designed to appeal to those with more anarchistic tendencies, who would be unlikely resonate with visions of a regimented beehive future. As with the Zeitgeist Movement, Anonymous is based on a total rejection of the existing system:
“ANONYMOUS declares war on the system! JOIN THE RESISTANCE!”
Anonymous describes itself as a leaderless, spontaneous, unorganized, grassroots movement. How anyone can believe that is beyond me, given the professional quality of the videos, the consistency of the style and content of the videos, and the sophisticated branding techniques, such as the ‘V for Vendetta’ masks. The words in the videos are spoken by computer software, giving the impression that the authors are successfully hiding their identities from the authorities. One needs to be incredibly naive to think the authors couldn’t be tracked down, and the videos taken down, if the authorities actually felt threatened by Anonymous.
The credibility of Anonymous is somewhat enhanced by various successful hacker attacks that have been attributed to it. But again, only the naive could believe the authorities couldn’t put a stop to this, if the perpetrators really were grassroots activists trying to take down the system. In fact, the source of the hacker attacks, as well as the source of Anonymous itself, is undoubtedly the Pentagon’s new Cyber Warfare division, carrying out its part in the class war against we the people.
Apart from propagating an anti-system message, and channeling the attention of some number of naive people, it is not clear what the real purpose of Anonymous is. My best guess at this point is that a really outrageous hacker attack will come along, Anonymous will claim credit, and that will be used as an excuse to seriously crack down on the use of the Internet by genuine activists. The Internet would then be politically sterilized, giving Internet psy-ops a clear field.
Let us now turn our attention to the rapidly growing Occupy Movement, which has captured the imagination and energy of activists, and a great many ordinary citizens, around the world. The home page of the Zeitgeist Movement, as of this writing, prominently displays support for the Occupy Movement. As with Zeitgeist and Anonymous, Occupy is based on a radical critique of the existing system, as we can read on the Occupy Together website:
Global civil society is being threatened by a system based on power and not on human values. Day after day it represses basic freedoms and consistently favors the greed of the few over the needs of the many. This power finances wars, food and pharmaceutical monopolies, it sponsors dictatorial regimes across the globe, destroying environments, manipulating and censoring information flow and transparency.
The movement was inspired by the Arab Spring movements, particularly Egypt’s Tahir Square Movement. Occupy burst on the scene all at once in mid September, following a call to action from Adbusters magazine, which has ties to George Soros. It rapidly became the dominant global protest movement. According to the Occupy Together website, the movement now has a visible presence in over 2,000 towns and cities worldwide.
The movement manifests as encampments, as in Tahir Square, where people stand around holding signs demanding an end to this and that abuse by the system. The movement has a specific decision-making process, based on General Assemblies, using an awkward consensus process in which it is very easy for any specific proposal to be blocked. This pattern was established at the original Wall Street encampment, by a leadership clique that knew exactly how they wanted things to operate, and the pattern has been faithfully adopted by subsequent encampments as the movement grew.
The main agenda of the movement seems to be managing its own encampments. It has no specific manifesto of demands, no vision of any particular system to replace the current one, and no strategy for actually bringing about change. In essence, it amounts to a global Tahir Square gathering – a mass of people waiting around for someone to announce a regime change.
This is how the building site is being cleared for regime change, in the case of the Western public opinion.